Skip to main content

How a Random Bug Hunt in an Open-Source Project Taught Me 3 QA Lessons to Dominate Testing in 2025

 How a Random Bug Hunt in an Open-Source Project Taught Me 3 QA Lessons to Dominate Testing in 2025 --

On a whim, I joined a weekend bug hunt for an open-source Fintech app on GitHub. As a QA at Codenia, I thought it’d be a fun side project—but it taught me 3 game-changing lessons that are revolutionizing how I test apps like FabSpin in 2025. Here’s what I learned.


  • Section 1: The Open-Source Adventure:
    • Context: “I stumbled on a GitHub issue for an open-source payment app, needing testers. I dove in, no expectations.”
    • Challenge: “I had to test unfamiliar code with a global team, under tight deadlines, using new tools.”
    • Outcome: “I found a critical API bug, got my first GitHub commit, and learned more than in months of sprints.”
  • Section 2: The 3 QA Lessons Learned:
    1. Crowdsource Testing with AI Boosts Speed:
      • Lesson: Used AI tools (e.g., Mabl) to prioritize test cases, then collaborated with community testers to verify.
      • Example: “Mabl flagged a transaction timeout; I confirmed it manually with a real-world edge case.”
      • Tip: “In 2025, leverage AI and community feedback for faster, smarter testing.”
    2. GitHub Issues Are Agile QA in Action:
      • Lesson: Logging bugs on GitHub taught me to write clear, actionable reports that devs love.
      • Example: “My bug report for a currency conversion error was fixed in 24 hours because I included logs and steps.”
      • Tip: “Treat every bug report like a GitHub issue—clarity wins in Agile teams.”
    3. Open-Source Builds Your QA Superpower: Empathy:
      • Lesson: Working with unpaid contributors showed me how empathy drives better collaboration.
      • Example: “I paired with a newbie dev to reproduce a bug, and we bonded over shared struggles.”
      • Tip: “Empathy makes you a QA leader, especially in distributed 2025 teams.”
  • Section 3: Why These Lessons Matter in 2025:
    • Trend: “Open-source is booming—80% of software includes open-source components (Synopsys, 2025).”
    • Impact: “These skills helped me lead a FabSpin sprint and land a LinkedIn recommendation.”
    • Future: “QA pros who contribute to open-source will shape the next wave of tech.”
  • Section 4: How You Can Start:
    • Step 1: Find a beginner-friendly open-source project on GitHub (e.g., ‘good first issue’ tags).
    • Step 2: Try a free AI tool like Mabl or BugBug to streamline your testing.
    • Step 3: Write one empathetic bug report this week, even for your day job.
  • CTA: “Want my free ‘Open-Source QA Starter Kit’ with tools and tips?

  • photo

    Khushboo Mishra
    Manual Tester | QA Enthusiast

    www.linkedin.com/in/khushboo-mishra-663584216/

    khushboom099@gmail.com

    Comments

    Popular posts from this blog

    No, AI Won't Steal Your Job: Why Manual Testing is More Critical Than Ever

    "Manual Testing Isn't Dead. It's Your Secret Weapon for Quality." If you spend any time on tech forums or LinkedIn, you’ve heard the prophecy: “Automation and AI are coming to replace manual testers.” The story goes that in the near future, smart algorithms will handle everything, making human testers obsolete. I’m a Software QA Engineer who has been in the trenches with everything from complex fintech platforms to social media and gaming apps. And I’m here to tell you that this prediction is fundamentally wrong. Manual testing isn't dead. It's evolving. And in an age dominated by automation, its role has become more specialized and more critical than ever. Automation can check for expected outcomes, but it can't replicate the one thing that truly defines quality: the human experience. The Automation Fallacy: What a Script Can't See Test automation is a game-changer, and I rely on it every day. It's brilliant for running repetitive regression suite...

    🌟 The Future of QA in 2025: Why Testers Are the Superheroes of Tech

      🚀 Introduction Developers get the spotlight. AI steals the headlines. But here’s the truth no one tells you: without testers, everything breaks . Think about it. Banking apps that lose your money. Healthcare systems that give wrong reports. Flight booking portals that crash mid-payment. One missed bug can cost millions — and sometimes even lives. That’s why 2025 is not the end of QA . It’s the beginning of a new era where testers become the superheroes of software development . 🦸 Testers: The Last Line of Defense In every software team, roles are clear: Developers build features. Testers protect users. And in today’s world, protection = trust . Companies spend billions building features, but a single bug can: Destroy customer trust. Damage brand reputation. Trigger lawsuits and losses. Testers are not bug hunters. Testers are business protectors . That’s why testers are more critical than ever. 🤖 AI Won’t Replace Testers — It Will ...

    Top 10 Manual Test Cases for Login Page (With Examples)

     The login page is the gateway to any application. As a QA tester, validating this feature is critical. In this post, we’ll cover 10 essential manual test cases you must write for login functionality, along with examples. Test Cases: Test Case ID Test Scenario Expected Result TC01 Enter valid username and password User logs in successfully TC02 Leave both fields blank and click login Show “Fields cannot be empty” TC03 Enter wrong username and correct password Show “Invalid credentials” TC04 Enter correct username and wrong password Show “Invalid credentials” TC05 Check password masking Password should be hidden with dots TC06 Check "Remember Me" functionality User stays logged in after refresh TC07 Click on "Forgot Password" Redirects to password recovery page TC08 Enter SQL injection script Input should be sanitized TC09 Enter special characters in username Show input validation TC10 Test login with expired credentials Show “Account expired” Bonus Tips: Al...