Skip to main content

Top 10 Manual Test Cases for Login Page (With Examples)

 The login page is the gateway to any application. As a QA tester, validating this feature is critical. In this post, we’ll cover 10 essential manual test cases you must write for login functionality, along with examples.


Test Cases:

Test Case IDTest ScenarioExpected Result
TC01Enter valid username and passwordUser logs in successfully
TC02Leave both fields blank and click loginShow “Fields cannot be empty”
TC03Enter wrong username and correct passwordShow “Invalid credentials”
TC04Enter correct username and wrong passwordShow “Invalid credentials”
TC05Check password maskingPassword should be hidden with dots
TC06Check "Remember Me" functionalityUser stays logged in after refresh
TC07Click on "Forgot Password"Redirects to password recovery page
TC08Enter SQL injection scriptInput should be sanitized
TC09Enter special characters in usernameShow input validation
TC10Test login with expired credentialsShow “Account expired”

Bonus Tips:

  • Always validate both client-side and server-side.

  • Log all failed login attempts (security testing).

  • Use tools like Postman to test login APIs.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

🌟 The Future of QA in 2025: Why Testers Are the Superheroes of Tech

  πŸš€ Introduction Developers get the spotlight. AI steals the headlines. But here’s the truth no one tells you: without testers, everything breaks . Think about it. Banking apps that lose your money. Healthcare systems that give wrong reports. Flight booking portals that crash mid-payment. One missed bug can cost millions — and sometimes even lives. That’s why 2025 is not the end of QA . It’s the beginning of a new era where testers become the superheroes of software development . 🦸 Testers: The Last Line of Defense In every software team, roles are clear: Developers build features. Testers protect users. And in today’s world, protection = trust . Companies spend billions building features, but a single bug can: Destroy customer trust. Damage brand reputation. Trigger lawsuits and losses. Testers are not bug hunters. Testers are business protectors . That’s why testers are more critical than ever. πŸ€– AI Won’t Replace Testers — It Will ...

Automation Just Got Smarter — Thanks to Cursor AI

  🧠 From Manual Testing to AI-Powered Automation: My Journey with Cursor AI πŸ’‘ Introduction For most of my QA career, I’ve lived in the world of manual testing — where every click, every test case, and every bug report was done by hand. But as the industry evolves, one truth became clear to me: “AI isn’t replacing testers — it’s upgrading them.” That’s why I decided to begin my automation journey with Cursor AI , an intelligent code editor that acts like your AI pair programmer. This isn’t just another tool. It’s like having a smart testing partner that learns with you, guides you, and speeds up your workflow — especially for someone transitioning from manual to automation. πŸš€ Why I Chose Cursor AI Cursor AI isn’t about shortcuts — it’s about learning smarter . Here’s what stood out for me: ⚡ Instant Code Assistance: You describe a scenario → it writes the Selenium/Python code. 🧩 Error Debugging in Seconds: Explains what went wrong and how to fix it. πŸ“š Bu...