Skip to main content

Bug Vs Features

Bug vs Feature: The Most Confused Concept in Tech


In every IT project, there's one old debate that refuses to die:

**"Is this a bug… or is it a feature?"**


What appears to be an innocuous question tends to become heated debates between developers, testers, product managers, and end users. Reality check: **If your user is lost — it's an issue.**

What is a Bug?


A **bug** is a surprise behavior or mistake in your application that keeps it from doing what it's supposed to do.

It can be:


* A button that does not work

* A crashing page

* Inaccurate data displaying

* Or any behavior that doesn't meet the documented requirement


**In short:**

*A bug violates your product promise.*

---


 What is a Feature?


A **feature** is an intentional, designed functionality introduced to enhance your product's value or user experience.


It may be:


* A new payment method

* Dark mode feature

* Auto-save for forms

* Or an AI chatbot in your app


**In short:**

*A feature is an addition. A bug is a deficit.*


### ???? Why the Confusion Occurs


Here's why **Bug vs Feature** debates begin:


* **Inadequate documentation**

* **Changes made at the last minute**

* **Team miscommunication**

* **Failure to consider user feedback**


At times, the devs may reject a bug with the phrase *"It's working as designed"*, while users indicate it as a defect because it adversely impacts them.


**Keep in mind:**

???? If it confuses, irks, or slows down your user — it's as good as a bug, whether intentional or not.


---


### ???? The Smart Way:


Stop arguing. Start watching.


**Ask yourself:**


* Is this behavior enhancing the user experience?

* Was this explicitly stated in the requirement document?

* Is this consistent on every platform?


If not — correct it.


---


### ???? Last Thought:


**A bug, if overlooked, kills trust.

A feature, if misinterpreted, annoys users.**


Therefore, before releasing your next build, make sure your product does what your user is looking for — and not what you presume.


---


## ???? Key Takeaway:


* ???? A **bug** destroys trust

* ???? A **feature** establishes it

* ???? If your user can't distinguish between the two — you're in deep trouble



photo

Khushboo Mishra
Manual Tester | QA Enthusiast

www.linkedin.com/in/khushboo-mishra-663584216/

khushboom099@gmail.com


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

No, AI Won't Steal Your Job: Why Manual Testing is More Critical Than Ever

"Manual Testing Isn't Dead. It's Your Secret Weapon for Quality." If you spend any time on tech forums or LinkedIn, you’ve heard the prophecy: “Automation and AI are coming to replace manual testers.” The story goes that in the near future, smart algorithms will handle everything, making human testers obsolete. I’m a Software QA Engineer who has been in the trenches with everything from complex fintech platforms to social media and gaming apps. And I’m here to tell you that this prediction is fundamentally wrong. Manual testing isn't dead. It's evolving. And in an age dominated by automation, its role has become more specialized and more critical than ever. Automation can check for expected outcomes, but it can't replicate the one thing that truly defines quality: the human experience. The Automation Fallacy: What a Script Can't See Test automation is a game-changer, and I rely on it every day. It's brilliant for running repetitive regression suite...
Post a Comment
Read more

🌟 The Future of QA in 2025: Why Testers Are the Superheroes of Tech

  🚀 Introduction Developers get the spotlight. AI steals the headlines. But here’s the truth no one tells you: without testers, everything breaks . Think about it. Banking apps that lose your money. Healthcare systems that give wrong reports. Flight booking portals that crash mid-payment. One missed bug can cost millions — and sometimes even lives. That’s why 2025 is not the end of QA . It’s the beginning of a new era where testers become the superheroes of software development . 🦸 Testers: The Last Line of Defense In every software team, roles are clear: Developers build features. Testers protect users. And in today’s world, protection = trust . Companies spend billions building features, but a single bug can: Destroy customer trust. Damage brand reputation. Trigger lawsuits and losses. Testers are not bug hunters. Testers are business protectors . That’s why testers are more critical than ever. 🤖 AI Won’t Replace Testers — It Will ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Top 10 Manual Test Cases for Login Page (With Examples)

 The login page is the gateway to any application. As a QA tester, validating this feature is critical. In this post, we’ll cover 10 essential manual test cases you must write for login functionality, along with examples. Test Cases: Test Case ID Test Scenario Expected Result TC01 Enter valid username and password User logs in successfully TC02 Leave both fields blank and click login Show “Fields cannot be empty” TC03 Enter wrong username and correct password Show “Invalid credentials” TC04 Enter correct username and wrong password Show “Invalid credentials” TC05 Check password masking Password should be hidden with dots TC06 Check "Remember Me" functionality User stays logged in after refresh TC07 Click on "Forgot Password" Redirects to password recovery page TC08 Enter SQL injection script Input should be sanitized TC09 Enter special characters in username Show input validation TC10 Test login with expired credentials Show “Account expired” Bonus Tips: Al...
Post a Comment
Read more